Closed
Bug 490329
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Cycle arrow buttons/icon in folderpane header are too small
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Folder and Message Lists, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0b4
People
(Reporter: Thunderbird_Mail_DE, Assigned: clarkbw)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 2 obsolete files)
1.71 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
6.18 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
2.87 KB,
patch
|
philor
:
review+
standard8
:
approval-thunderbird3+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Thunderbird 3.0b3pre 20090426 - default theme
The small arrow buttons in folderpane header have only a few (maybe 8?) pixel width. They are hard to use. BTW they should be arranged left ( < ) and ( > ) right of the text.
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
it is a tad subtle. I thought we had a bug on this, but not finding one
Severity: normal → minor
Summary: Arrow buttons in folderpane header are to small → Cycle arrow buttons/icon in folderpane header are too small
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
1680 x 1050 is getting pretty high reso.
still, I'd expect the arrows to be more visible
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Folder pane arrows on Vista (Aero Theme) at 1280 x 1024 px
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
those are tiny buttons, I wonder what happened there. We seem normal on Mac and Linux. The XP arrows look ok to me as well, however the Vista ones are really broken somehow.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
AFAIR this was broken _before_ the aero theme separation.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
cool, at least we have a way to fix it now :)
Does the Dom Inspector tell you anything interesting about those buttons?
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Not really. The CSS is in classic/aero/messenger/mailWindow1.css:
.folderview-cycler {
-moz-padding-end: 0px !important;
}
Increasing the padding would fix the too small buttons:
.folderview-cycler {
-moz-padding-start: 5px !important;
-moz-padding-end: 5px !important;
}
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> Not really. The CSS is in classic/aero/messenger/mailWindow1.css:
>
> .folderview-cycler {
> -moz-padding-end: 0px !important;
> }
>
> Increasing the padding would fix the too small buttons:
>
> .folderview-cycler {
> -moz-padding-start: 5px !important;
> -moz-padding-end: 5px !important;
> }
Thanks for taking a look at this Alexander!
Once we get the separate mailWindow1-aero.css from bug 494430 then this is an easy fix. I just removed the folderview-cycler padding entry and the buttons increase to a 9px width. I'm not sure what's normal though.
Depends on: 494430
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Hardware: x86 → All
Whiteboard: [needs patch][good first bug][waiting on bug 494430]
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
Ok, I'm not going to wait on bug 494430 anymore and will just try to get this fixed now. Patch coming...
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
I really wish I had XP now because I didn't get to test out why the existing mailWindow1.css needs the !important flag for the .folderview-cycler selector.
It's possible that this patch is more a matter of removing that selector altogether.
Or we could at least remove the !important superstitions such that my patch doesn't have to use it as well.
If we commit this patch, then the existing patch in bug 494430 will have to be redone, but it won't exactly be aeronautical engineering to do it.
Attachment #398042 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> Increasing the padding would fix the too small buttons:
>
> .folderview-cycler {
> -moz-padding-start: 5px !important;
> -moz-padding-end: 5px !important;
> }
Oh, and I meant to thank Alexander in the commit message for this snippet that I used.
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the delay, that's about how long it takes my XP VM to build ;)
You can drop the the !important - whatever it was for is gone, assuming it ever existed. Fun fact that I'm going to completely ignore until someone (who is not you) both reports it and patches it: XP Classic is at least as broken as Vista+ Aero, it's really only XP Luna that actually works.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #398042 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #398042 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 398042 [details] [diff] [review]
patch from bug 494430 converted to just fix this issue
I'll be happy to (quickly, so it doesn't rot like this one did) r+a the non-!important patch.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → clarkbw
Flags: wanted-thunderbird3+
Whiteboard: [needs patch][good first bug][waiting on bug 494430]
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
> You can drop the the !important - whatever it was for is gone, assuming it ever
> existed. Fun fact that I'm going to completely ignore until someone (who is not
> you) both reports it and patches it: XP Classic is at least as broken as Vista+
> Aero, it's really only XP Luna that actually works.
All sorts of good things to hear! ;)
Here's the new patch, thanks for getting your XP running again.
Attachment #399410 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 399410 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch with comments addressed
Sorry, my comment was unclear enough to confuse you into forgetting what you already knew in comment 10. What I meant was that you could remove your !important in mailWindow1-aero.css, that you needed (at least one of) to override the !important in mailWindow1.css, by also removing the !important in mailWindow1.css, because it isn't needed by XP.
Attachment #399410 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
i can haz right patch?
Attachment #399410 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #399552 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment 17•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 399552 [details] [diff] [review]
actually address the review comments, not my mixed up interpretations
DO WANT!
Attachment #399552 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Attachment #399552 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #399552 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #399552 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3? → approval-thunderbird3+
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•